FYI, gentle friends, site content will probably be spotty over the next few weeks. I’m off to Tokyo Game Show, which I’ll be covering alone, which means not much in the way of free time. When I get back, though, I’ll put the wraps on Zelda and move along to something new and exciting.
Kenseiden is not a good game. One of the primary problems with many older console games is that they maintained the sensibilities of the arcades from which the video gaming craze spawned. Some developers handled this transition better than others, realizing that without the quarter-sucking impetus, the player didn’t have to be punished at all times.
Unfortunately, Kenseiden did not reflect this lesson. Enemies seem to spawn from nowhere, respawn with impunity after small backtracks by the player, and many tend to move so fast that there’s absolutely no time to react at all. This is not helped by the fact that, like many arcade games, Kenseiden utilizes rather large sprites. While these sprites do look quite good, especially given the vintage of the game, it leaves very little space by which to dodge. It’s almost Ninja Gaiden-esque in its unfairness. In some ways it’s worse, as the controls are often not responsive enough to react effectively to enemy threats.
The game compensates for this failing through its sense of progression. Your path through the game is non-linear, allowing the player to chart their own path through the game. Various training grounds appear through the game, allowing procurement of an extended life meter and items that increase defense. This is a great idea, but it also comes gated behind a massive wall of memorization. You’ll find is a sword-improving item and a life restorative that kicks in when your energy meter is depleted—necessary to defeat bosses, who drop scrolls that give the hero new techniques. Some of these prove quite useful and add to the sense of empowerment.
This empowerment is what often creates some of the greatest games of all time. Super Metroid and Castlevania: Symphony of the Night immediately come to mind. But it also allows games that would otherwise be considered fairly weak to rise above their technical limitations. And that’s exactly the case with Kenseiden.
It’s actually strange to see Kenseiden compared to Castlevania in some circles. Is it the diagonal staircases? The horror motif? At any rate, the game owes far more to games like Metroid or Zelda II, although it’s much more linearly constrained. (Okay, fine, we can count Simon’s Quest, too.) Player progression defined those titles, too, but there it was coupled with exploration elements that complemented their design (Simon’s Quest’s arcane clues notwithstanding). The player actually did interesting things with the abilities that were procured. Kenseiden uses them to compensate for glaring design flaws, and employs them as a punishment for gamers not taking the “right” path, which means that choice in the game is ultimately illusory.
Then again, many games give us that same illusion of choice, so maybe the harshness is, to some degree, undeserved. Most gamers will likely find their views on the title to soften as they proceed through the game. A revision of the initial statement may be in order.
Kenseiden is not a good game, but it is an interesting game.
Article by Lee Hathcock
GameSpite Journal 12: Kenseiden
6 thoughts on “GameSpite Journal 12: Kenseiden”
How come you’re covering TGS all by yourself? Is TGS not considered “important” enough anymore for big coverage from large media sites?
TGS is pretty much a ghost town. Lots of sites are sending no one at all. Two would be overkill for us.
I really like the direction of the lastest articles, such as the Castlevania and Zelda deconstructions. The comparison of the start of Zelda and the start of Adventure were revelotory, even after years of reading about gaming on the internet. The way Castlevania games were made so that the archetecture of the levels makes sense in real world terms (no floating platforms) was really eye opening, as I have been struggling with this in a 2.5D context.
Is there a resolution or browser width to view the site at so the game images arent scale using nearest neighbor? Seeing classic games with arbitrary pixel lines doubled in size is a bit offputting. Oddly this seems to be more apparent with Master System games than NES games. I feel it makes the games look worse than they do.
@Suto How are you looking at the site? I publish images either true resolution or doubled with Nearest Neighbor and it’s not supposed to be a dynamic site layout, so the sizes should be fixed. The images should be fine for everyone. Are you on a mobile phone or something?
I am using IE 8, at 100% zoom, on windows xp. The problem is most noticeable on the mostly red Zillion screen shot, on the spiky things at the bottom of the screen. Some of the tips are wider than the others. It is also noticeable on the cinema screen of the blue haired guy.
It doesnt seem to be happening in the Kenseiden screenshots, and the Zelda ones seem good, sorry if it is something that was already fixed.
I think the source files for Zillion were borked — nothing to do with the site layout.
Comments are closed.