(Continued from yesterday)
I guess I was wrong about no one liking my Enterprise posts. So the lack of comments and drop in traffic every time I posted about the show were a strangely consistent coincidence. Hmm.
Surprisingly, the most important episodes of the entire final season of Enterprise, from a bigger picture perspective, were the two I least expected to like: The mirror universe two-parter. The mirror universe theme was novel but quickly became played out, and Enterprise already explored an alternate universe at the beginning of the season. Did we really need another?
The answer turned out to be “not really,” but I’m glad they went ahead with it anyway. The redeeming plot twist: An anomalous discovery made by the evil Enterprise crew wasn’t their counterparts from the normal reality as I expected, but rather the U.S.S. Defiant, lost in both time and reality. Not only was this a neat nod to an actual plot point in the original series episode “The Tholian Web,” where the Defiant vanished into a space-time rift never to be heard from again, but it also did a great deal to legitimize the relationship between Enterprise and the original series.
The masterstroke was the way it played the whole thing totally straight. A lot of people complain about the aesthetic differences between Enterprise and the ’60s episodes — how could tech revert back to analog computers and clean, simple ship geometry? But the mirror-Enterprise crew takes over Defiant and just rolls with it, making use of the garish uniforms and blinking panel lights and that crazy science viewer type that Spock always peered through. They switch over to classic communicators and Type II phasers and walk through those bright red doors as natural as day. Aside from a single snide remark about the puke-green captain’s tunic — which, let’s face it, has always looked kind of gross — Enterprise took the aesthetics of the original series as face value.
The show runners could have reenvisioned the Defiant to look like this, but thank god — they didn’t.
And it works, because the characters regard the Defiant with barely restrained reverence. It’s clearly the product of technology a century beyond their own, and it’s treated as this sort of ultimate juggernaut of space technology — which is exactly how it should be. It made me respectful of the elegant power inherent in the ol’ Constitution class for the first time in years. I loved the way the exterior shots of the ship were composed as tight crops underscored by a deep, thrumming sound, as if the starship contained too much power to be contained in the same frame that normally presented the NX-01.
Of course the Defiant‘s control surfaces are covered with obscure lights and switches — the tech is so far advanced it doesn’t need to work the way Enterprise‘s near-future devices do! Of course it’s streamlined and sleek — it’s the product of a more advanced society that doesn’t need superfluous detail to express the concepts of speed or power. After the series moved back away from the mirror universe, it made me more aware of how thoughtfully the NX-01 had been designed to seem workmanlike and unfinished: the utilitarian spaces, the unadorned elements of internal structure lining the ship. In other words, despite having nothing to do with the core Enterprise plot line (and featuring the hilariously awful sight of Scott Bakula trying to play “evil”), the “In a Mirror, Darkly” two-parter made both Enterprise and Trek as a whole better. That’s quite a trick.
I’m sad that the series ended before it had the chance to explore the charting of the Federation in more detail, and before it could explore the Romulan war, and all the other backstory concepts it clearly was aspiring to develop. But they managed to do a bang-up job within the limited space they had, and as other shows have proven time and again it’s always best to go out on a high note. I think it was Rick Berman who recently made comments about how the show would have spent an entire season in the mirror universe and revealed the “future guy” sabotaging the past during the Temporal Cold War to be an older Archer, both of which sound like terrible ideas. Someone somewhere has suggested that if you combine the four seasons of Enterprise with the three seasons of the original series you get a seven-year saga the same as all the other Trek spin-offs… and you know, it works.
Anyway, let the record show that I went into Enterprise with a defiant sense of reluctance — I’m going to watch this even though it’s not very good — and came away totally enamored with the show. It didn’t just exceed my expectations lowered by years of Internet deprecation; it blew away anything I could have imagined when the series first launched in 2001. Paramount will begin issuing the series on Blu-ray soon (probably to buy time for them to remaster more Next Generation episodes), and you can bet I’ll be showing my support for the series by picking them up… yes, even the mediocre season one and two.
The one downside to Enterprise‘s unexpected excellence is that it’s made me like JJ Abrams’ take on the franchise a bit less. When I saw the movie, it was with the mindset that the people behind Trek and the corporate machine responsible for its creation had lost sight of its original spirit and how to express the series’ concept in not-embarrassing ways. But clearly that’s not true, and Enterprise seasons three and four stand up to the best we’ve seen in 50 years of the franchise.
Old school Trek can still matter. Maybe not in the current Hollywood climate, but eventually. The way Enterprise proved its mettle and earned its right to tackle familiar, classic Trek elements could happen again with the right talent behind it. Moreover, it highlights why I worry that Benedict Cumberbatch’s mysterious villain in Star Trek: Into Darkness will turn out to be Noonian Khan Singh. Khan worked in The Wrath of Khan because of his history with Kirk, and because of the inequity imposed on the two characters by passage of time. Chris Pine’s Kirk arguably doesn’t even deserve to command a starship, let alone face off against a character made compelling by his lengthy history with the protagonist.
Also, Trek ’09 turns out to be made from plot snippets swiped from Enterprise: For example, the Narada takes the place of the Defiant in the mirror universe episode as a temporally displaced supership that upsets the balance of galactic power. Heck, even the movie’s attack on Earth via San Francisco looks like a recycled shot of the Mars energy array whiffing an attack on Starfleet Headquarters in “Terra Prime.”
Oh well. I’ll still watch Into Darkness and quite likely love it, but it’ll be with a nagging sensation at the back of my mind that it’s just a glorified mirror universe episode that doesn’t really matter in the long run.
12 thoughts on “Trek Trek: Defiant to the end”
I think we can all agree the only way Sherlock is going to fill Kahn’s shoes is if he can fill out his shirt, too.
But Khan didn’t wear a… ohhhh.
In a perfect world, J.J. Abrams would hand the reins to the third Star Trek movie to someone with experience on the original show but who never had a chance to go whole hog crazy with it – Manny Coto or Ronald D. Moore, and let that third film dovetail (somehow, even if only thematically) into a new, prime-universe Trek series run by that same crew.
You always got the feeling Abrams only accepted the Star Trek gig because it was the closest gig to Star Wars he could get, and so I hope he has the brains to hand it off to someone else who can guide that franchise back to it’s former TV glory.
Anyway, yeah, the design of the NX-01 was pretty cool. It seems like they decided to build a bridge that was a more cramped version of Kirk’s bridge, sans all the grey paneling on the consoles and weird day-glo paint and lighting. (It’s been rumoured that if Enterprise had been allowed to go on, the ship would’ve eventually gotten a secondary hull upgrade that would’ve brought it closer in line with the classic Constitution design as well.)
Sadly, I suspect that Paramount regards anyone involved with pre-Abrams Trek as sales poison, regardless of whether or not that’s the case.
I’m intrigued by the concept of the NX-01 with a secondary hull. I rather like the ship’s design as it is and wonder how they could add such a significant expansion without looking like a mutant.
Oh crumbs. When you said “Defiant,” I thought you meant the boxy ship from Deep Space Nine!
Man, DS9 got NO love from Paramount after the series ended. And that’s a shame, because I’d argue that it offered some of the franchise’s best moments.
Leaving a comment to say I love these posts. Since you need *encouragement*. I’ve only watched a spattering of Enterprise episodes, so it’s interesting to hear someone going against the popular refrain (that Enterprise sucked).
And, let’s be honest: it can’t be much worse than the JJ Abrams flick, which doesn’t really feel like Star Trek but instead a lens flare being tortured.
I don’t need encouragement so much as I need for traffic not to take a nosedive any time I mention Enterprise.
And now, I have an overwhelming urge to watch the whole series. Thanks for these, Jeremy!
Ditto the above comments: You’ve made me want to watch seasons 3 and 4, and Abrams’ Trek feels like Star Wars in Star Trek clothing.
I think good Star Trek, or something like it, will come back for a basic reason: The world has only so much appetite for space opera and will eventually hunger again for the diplomacy, philosophy, hard sci-fi and lifestyles of the future that makes Trek Trek.
Star Trek is many things, Vega, but one thing it is not, and ever was, is hard science fiction. Star Trek is the King of made up technical babble. It’s not rooted in any real science, it’s just there to sound “cool”.
It’s not a space opera, but it’s certainly not science fiction. You need some science for that. It was, like Roddenberry wanted, a space drama, or space western.
I always adored the way the NX-01 looked, both on the inside and out. The LCD-panels, exposed cabling, unpainted steel made the ship look like it could actually have come out of our future, and is a very good bridge for the polished and streamlined tech shown in later shows. It very much looks like a rough alpha or beta test of Star Trek concepts that show up later in the franchise.
As for wishing we got to see more of the birth of the Federation/Romulan war, I’m with you. The final episode gives us some of that, and even if it’s a poor send-off of the franchise and has TNG shoe-horned in in an awkward way, if you strip out all that shit, you’re left with a somewhat compelling send-off of the Enterprise crew as they’ve clearly evolved at that point into the stuff of legends and people who can bear the weight of the galaxy on their shoulders (at least, Archer and Trip have; T’Pol on the other hand seems to have grown more human/emotional and can’t deal with it as much). Even if fat-Riker ruined that final episode, I still think very fondly of the scene in a waiting room where Archer gets a pep-talk from T’Pol before making the speech of his life to the newly formed Federation. It’s majestic stuff.
You’ve made a compelling case. I’ll watch the Enterprise finale… as part of my viewing of The Next Generation season 7, where it fits chronologically.
Comments are closed.